Accepted Manuscripts

In response to feedback from the research community, AISTHESIS is now making articles available online after the acceptance. 

As a free service, making the accepted manuscript available has a number of benefits for our authors, including;

  • Earlier opportunity for research to be read and cited

  • Authors can promote their work as soon as it is accepted by their peers - maintaining the momentum of the publication process

  • Improved opportunities for funding approval as researchers can list their work earlier.

This version of the manuscript will not be language-edited or typeset and will be provided as a flat PDF.

We will continue to work with authors on the production of their article, and the final version of record will replace the accepted manuscript version once this has been completed. 



Les frontières entre réel et imaginaire à l’épreuve des promenades sonores in situ (Soundwalks)

Lucia Angelino

Aisthesis. 11. DOI: 10.13128/Aisthesis-24936

Abstract. This article examines the particular aesthetic experience brought about by soundwalks where the spectator circulates in a more or less structured fashion. In each case, the point of departure is the phenomenological analysis of a few examples taken from Janet Cardiff’s Walks and the audio-tours Remote x by Rimini Protokoll. Based on a rereading of texts by Merleau-Ponty and Husserl, I will examine the conflicts of perception and the peculiar shift from one order of perception to another that punctuate the spectator’s walking, as well as the intertwining of the real and the imaginary coming into being in such performances and experienced at the very level of his bodily inscription in space. Overall, by reinvestigating Merleau-Ponty’s phenomenology of perception, I hope to demonstrate that many issues raised by these itinerant performances (soundwalks) have already been anticipated by Merleau-Ponty and, in turn, place a spotlight on his phenomenological approach as the most pertinent and insightful to articulate both the nuances (complexities) and the depth of the aesthetic experience here in question.

Accepted on 2019, 19 March

What is an Accepted Manuscript? 

Download PDF


A proposito di realtà percettive artificiali

Andrea Togni

Accepted on 2019, 8 April

Abstract. While shaping and defending a criterion to individuate the sensory modalities, philosophers have to deal with groups of perceptual states that don’t fit into the catalogue of the senses comfortably. I call these groups «grey areas». In this paper, I present the «artificial grey area», which is about perceptions obtained through artificial devices that replace or augment one’s sensory abilities. More precisely, the spotlight is on the results that the experiential criterion, the experiential-ontological criterion and the subtractive criterion provide when artificially-assisted perceptions fall under their scope. The main theses of the paper are that each sensory device allows users to access a peculiar sensory world, and that each of these worlds should be associated with a peculiar, independent sensory modality. 

Key words: Individuation of the senses; artificial grey area; sensory substitution devices; experiential-ontological criterion; subtractive criterion.

What is an Accepted Manuscript? 

Download PDF

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (CC-BY- 4.0)

Firenze University Press
Via Cittadella, 7 - 50144 Firenze
Tel. (0039) 055 2757700 Fax (0039) 055 2757712