ANNOUNCEMENT: CAMBIO accepted for indexing in ERIH PLUS
It is a pleasure to announce that CAMBIO has been approved for inclusion in ERIH PLUS. The European Reference Index for the Humanities and the Social Sciences (ERIH PLUS) is the most important and prestigious reference index in the European Union when it comes to international quality and impact accreditation for scientific journals in the areas of Humanities and Social Sciences.
A New Course for CAMBIO
CAMBIO. Rivista sulle trasformazioni sociali is a peer-reviewed and open-access electronic journal now in its seventh year. It aims to promote theoretical and analytical debates at international level arising from contributions focused on processes of change that are affecting present-day individuals and societies at both local and global levels. CAMBIO's main inspiration is sociological, but it has deliberately chosen to place itself in the open field of the social sciences, convinced that there can be no real depth of specialization without acceptance of the challenge of complexity, a challenge that must be faced in any attempt to interpret, understand, explain or comprehend.
The issues of the new series will present the usual structure: every issue features a monographic theme on which researchers and social scientists debate their views, without the exclusion of contributions from the other human sciences and, when called for, the so-called natural sciences. The journal's non-monographic sections also adopt this approach. Essays and Research welcomes contributions on various topics, with a focus on experimental strategies that are methodologically and disciplinarily open. Eliasian Themes purposes to acquaint readers with the journal's deep and enduring roots in the Elias tradition, by hosting discussions of his works, but especially by favouring research and theoretical reflection that adopt his methods and theoretical frameworks. In addition, we will present and translate (at least in the Italian version) a selection of his shorter unpublished writings. By contrast, the Contributions section will be a forum for freer, non-academic debates on contemporary political, social and cultural topics. The journal concludes with a Reviews and Profiles section, supplemented by Book Reviews of texts that encourage interdisciplinary confrontation and, starting from the new series, by Re-reading the classics.
In the beginning of this new course, we wish to express our gratitude to the outgoing editor Paolo Giovannini who has decided to hand over the reins to us, entrusting us with the task of relaunching and widening the themes and horizons of the journal.
Thanks to the collaboration of the brilliant scholars who have joined the Scientific and Editorial Boards of CAMBIO, and to the hard work of the Editorial Office, we hope to be able to realize a new ground-breaking international academic journal.
Angela Perulli Chief Editor
Rocco Sciarrone Co-Editor
21 October 2016
EDITOR IN CHIEF
Angela Perulli, Università degli Studi di Firenze, Italy
Rocco Sciarrone, Università di Torino, Italy
Carlo Baccetti, Università degli Studi di Firenze, Italy
Luca Bagnoli, Università degli Studi di Firenze, Italy
Francesca Bianchi, Università di Siena, Italy
Massimo Bressan, IRIS Prato, Italy
Filippo Buccarelli, Università degli Studi di Firenze, Italy
Flavio Ceravolo, Università di Pavia, Italy
Dimitri D'Andrea, Università degli Studi di Firenze, Italy
Florence Delmotte, Université Saint-Louis, Bruxelles, Belgium
Stefanie Ernst, Münster Universität, Germany
Michael Eve, Università del Piemonte Orientale, Italy
Laura Leonardi, Università degli Studi di Firenze, Italy
Paolo Giovannini, Università degli Studi di Firenze, Italy
Steve Loyal, University College of Dublin, Ireland
Alessandro Lutri, Università di Catania, Italy
Emmanuele Pavolini, Università di Macerata, Italy
Annalisa Tonarelli, Università degli Studi di Firenze, Italy
Franca Alacevich, Università degli Studi di Firenze, Italy
Giacomo Becattini, Università degli Studi di Firenze, Italy
Ian Budge, University of Essex, UK
Sergio Caruso, Università degli Studi di Firenze, Italy
Alessandro Cavalli, IUSS Pavia, Italy
Idalina Conde, Instituto Universitário de Lisboa ISCTE-IUL, Portugal
Franco Crespi, Università di Perugia, Italy
Johan Goudsblom, Universität von Amsterdam, Holland
Paolo Jedlowski, Università delle Calabria, Italy
Hermann Korte, Universität Hamburg, Germany
Massimo Livi Bacci, Università degli Studi di Firenze, Italy
Alberto Marradi, Universidad Tres Febrero de Buenos Aires, Argentina
Stephen Mennell, University College of Dublin, Ireland
Andrea Messeri, Università di Siena, Italy
Fausto Miguelez, Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona, Spain
Teresa Torns, Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona, Spain
Robert Van Krieken, University of Sidney, Australia
Marcello Verga, Università degli Studi di Firenze, Italy
Giovanna Vicarelli, Università di Ancona, Italy
Andrea Bellini, Università degli Studi di Firenze, Italy
Davide Donatiello, Università di Torino, Italy
Emily Gubbini, Master MSc, University of Edimburgh, UK
Vincenzo Marasco, Università degli Studi di Firenze, Italy (Editor Manager)
Federico Silvestri, PoieinLab Pistoia, Italy
Call for Papers
CAMBIO. Rivista sulle trasformazioni sociali
[Call for papers]
Number 13, June2017
For the Review’s monographic section we will consider theoretical and research contributions on the topic:
Is (historical) sociology Eurocentric?. Nation building, European integration and cosmopolitanism: critical and normative visions
Edit by Florence Delmotte
From precursors Marx and Tocqueville up to contemporaries like Stefano Bartolini (Restructuring Europe, 2005) via classics (Weber, Geertz and Elias, Tilly, Wallerstein or Anderson), historical sociology of the modern political has always had much to do with Europe. Almost by definition: is not the nation state born in Europe? Sociologists, be they comparativists or not, have been searching for avoiding evolutionism legated by the nineteenth and early twentieth centuries’ social theorists Marx and Comte as well as Spencer or Durkheim. However, (historical) sociology, even when closer to idiographic approaches rather than to nomothetic sociology, is often suspected of (at least unintentional) Eurocentrism.
This issue proposes to take seriously this criticism and to test it by questioning the visions of Europe and Cosmopolitanism that stems both from classic and from current socio-historical analyses in sociology, political science and EU studies. It centrally aims at tackling these issues: Does the historical sociology entail specific normative visions of Europe and of “post-national constellations” (Habermas, 2000)? To what extent does it propose “critical” views (Delanty, 2006) on trans-nationalisation processes at work from 1945 and on the scepticism that followed?
The issue is open to empirical and theoretical issues as such:
1) Does the legacy of classics in contemporary figures of historical sociology entail specific normative and critical visions about the future of European societies, in the frame of EU and beyond? What about the role of human rights, for instance?
2) How (historical) sociology has recently been impacting EU studies and national case studies, notably in matter of Euroscepticism?
Finally, how could we gain analytical leverage from the links between sociology, law, history and political philosophy in order to tackle cosmopolitan issues?
The editors are also interested in evaluating contributions to the Journal’s non-thematic area, which includes the Sections Eliasian Themes, Essays and Researches, and Contributions. They also invite profiles, reviews and recommendations of books, essays and scientific events. The invitation to participate in the selection is intended for researchers from all fields of the social sciences, with no preference for particular theoretical or methodological approaches. The texts - unpublished and not submitted simultaneously for evaluation by other journals - must be sent by march 10th, 2017, to the editors, in docx, doc, or rtf format, according to the Indications for authors published on our website, at:
The editors determine the publishability of contributions on the basis of the opinions of anonymous referees, in accordance with the double-blind peer review formula. Exception is made only for articles in the Comments section.
The editors will inform authors of the outcome of the referee decisions, and hence acceptance or not of the article within a month after its submission. The texts sent must be between 30,000 and 50,000 characters (spaces and bibliographical references included). There must also be attached: a) a brief biographical note (approximately 600 characters, spaces included) must contain information about the university/institution of membership, research topics pursued, projects in progress, and major publications; b) a short abstract in English, in which the gist of the article is indicated in a clear and concise manner; c) some keywords (3 to 6, at the close of the English abstract) in order to recap with extreme brevity the subjects treated.
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (CC-BY- 4.0)
Tel. (0039) 055 2757700 Fax (0039) 055 2757712